GGaD » "We don't know what to name this"

Time · June 12, 2020 17:59:07

Woww, all galaxians?

Why would you regret it?

GalaxianExplosion · June 12, 2020 18:24:17

"All Galaxians"???
Well because I clearly suck at RPing, why else xD

-Galaxian-

Time · June 12, 2020 23:08:39

All galaxians as in forumfics primarily used forumer personas. Or at least in the WoFMB, what about the SAMB?

Bruh don't think like that. I think your rping is fairly fine.

GalaxianExplosion · June 13, 2020 00:04:56

Galaxian was rarely used in forumfics actually, I mostly used Hitan and some other OCs who I don't use as often. But for the places I did use him it was my forum!persona like you mentioned xD, who I am desperately trying to fix atm and failing at.
"Fairly fine" xD I read that as "legible and barely able to be comprehended"
Also Nagesh's form will be out in 2021 xD hope nothing big happens in the Clocktower 'cause yeah. I was wondering though, did you want him to be recommended by Hitan or something???

-Galaxian-

Time · June 13, 2020 13:31:11

Oh I see then.

Fine means of high quality or good or satisfactory.

Oh uhh well lets see what happens. Tbh how he is introduced doesn't really matter to me.

GalaxianExplosion · June 13, 2020 14:46:21

Huge jumps in your definitions there I see xDDD (*talking like Yoda for some reason kinda idk why*)
Alright

-Galaxian-

Time · June 13, 2020 16:42:42

Just saying what google says.

GalaxianExplosion · June 13, 2020 17:10:23

Google be credible huh

-Galaxian-

Time · June 13, 2020 21:48:49

Fine. Do you want me to say the Oxford Dictionary?

I agree with the definition anyways.

GalaxianExplosion · June 13, 2020 21:53:48

Yes :D
I don't disagree with it, I just find the variation very funny

-Galaxian-

Time · June 13, 2020 22:09:37

Too bad

I didn't say you were disagreeing with it. Just giving multiply varied definitions

GalaxianExplosion · June 13, 2020 22:15:20

D:

-Galaxian-

Time · June 13, 2020 22:31:55

ngl how am I to respond to this

GalaxianExplosion · June 13, 2020 23:03:29

Using more emojis owo?

-Galaxian-

Time · June 14, 2020 00:41:15

oh that is true.

But it's not long till we run out.

also do you know if there's a way to not make these emojis automatic?

GalaxianExplosion · June 14, 2020 00:47:20

If we were to disable emoticons they would no longer be automatic

-Galaxian-

Time · June 14, 2020 00:50:24

oh well

GalaxianExplosion · June 14, 2020 14:08:25

Why do I feel like you're looking down at me from your 5' 7'' or so height and being like "Disable them "

-Galaxian-

GalaxianExplosion · June 14, 2020 21:20:54

I can't post on the wiki rn but offering my two cents on the merging of the I.Q. threads thing? I'd advise against it. Xenon's thread has many more mature implications and I'd personally really prefer to keep the mature things separate from the more innocuous ones

-Galaxian-

Time · June 15, 2020 00:10:42

fine fine makes sense.ig. Though I'd think it would be ok if everyone agreed.

Disable him.

Time · June 15, 2020 00:10:59

Bye.

GalaxianExplosion · June 15, 2020 01:46:21

If you count me as someone then there would never be an 'everyone agreed' scenario
o.o Time no
Also 'him',,,

-Galaxian-

Time · June 15, 2020 17:49:00

You just like to disagree or something?

GalaxianExplosion · June 15, 2020 18:51:01

"Like to"? I like to have my own opinion on things and I like to be included. There's no argument that could convince me on the matter, therefore there would never be an 'everyone agrees' scenario. My upbringing decrees a natural hesitation and negative attitude against cuss words and mature topics, thus I would never be able to turn that completely around at this point

-Galaxian-

Time · June 15, 2020 22:01:07

So, what about things like "Racism is bad." or "Homophobia is bad"

You're saying that you would disagree if the opinion of everyone is in agreement with it? Hopefully not. Right?

GalaxianExplosion · June 15, 2020 23:16:54

I don't know why you're pulling that into this but ok then
Not everyone can be in agreement if I disagree, and I daresay I'm not the only one disagreeing with it. As per wiki rules state, even on chat people can't swear unless all there are ok with it. The I.Q. thread is public and as it goes with the prior thread's guidelines, "clean vines/memes please", the opinion thing didn't really matter in the first place.

-Galaxian-

Time · June 16, 2020 12:16:01

No no just a big example that's all. Examples are needed.

So it's for kinda smaller things? Not big stuff like that?

GalaxianExplosion · June 16, 2020 12:29:41

What smaller things? I don't understand why you seem to think or am just implying that I said I insist on disagreeing with every topic in existence or something. You said "though I think it'd be ok if everyone agreed" for the IQ thread merging thing, but I had previously posted here with why I disagreed with the merging in the first place, due to the mature implications and language in Xenon's I.Q. thread. Thus, I made the argument that there would never be an 'everyone agreed' scenario since I don't and won't agree to the I.Q. thread merging idea (thus I mentioned my upbringing being a reason for this; you probably already know I'm against cussing very casually and I'm considerably young and stuff to be comfortable with mature topics) and am perhaps unfortunately 'someone' (someone disagrees =/ everyone agrees). I don't wanna make this seem like a bigger deal than it is, but I do have to admit I'm kinda upset that you would even think I would think that racism and homophobia are ok or whatever just for the sake of disagreeing. Ofc, those two are topics that people out there do disagree with, since homophobes and racist people do exist. I don't consider myself part of those two groups. Overall what I'm trying to say is that I don't disagree for the sake of disagreeing, no matter if it's a big or small thing. I just have my own opinion and I'd like to be counted.

-Galaxian-

Time · June 16, 2020 15:47:13

The reason why I believed that you insisted on disagreeing with every topic is that first, you said that, "If you count me as someone then there would never be an 'everyone agreed' scenario" which made me think that this was the start of a new subject topic. Plus saying that, "Therefore there would never be an 'everyone agrees' scenario." Helped support the thought of that you were saying that just for everything, not just the one topic of trying to merge two IQ threads together.

To me, it seemed like "My upbringing decrees a natural hesitation and negative attitude against cuss words and mature topics, thus I would never be able to turn that completely around at this point." was an example of you explaining why you disagreed on something.

Time · June 16, 2020 15:47:52

I'm sure that this has been created on another misunderstanding.